RSS

BAD BUSINESS

Craigslist Gold Digger Gets Verbally “Shot” Down.

Her Ad: What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful (spectacularly
beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy. I’m not from New York. I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think I’m overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200- 250. But that’s where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won’t get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms

-What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won’t hurt my feelings

-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I’m 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I’ve seen really ‘plain jane’ boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I’ve seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What’s the story there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out?
Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY

Please hold your insults - I’m putting myself out there in an honest way.
Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I’m being up front about it.
I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.

it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 432279810
THE ANSWER
Dear Pers-431649184:

His Response:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I’m not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here’s how I see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity…in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won’t be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you’re 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold…hence the rub…marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense to “buy you” (which is what you’re asking) so I’d rather lease. In case you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It’s as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as “articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful” as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn’t found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way. Classic “pump and dump.” I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.

Thanks to this guy for firing the first shot.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

17 Comments For This Post

  1. Mike Says:

    This is brilliant! Perfect humour from the response.

    P.S. Great site!

  2. Erin Says:

    I want to date this man. He gave her want she wanted, but I have a feeling, not at all what she expected. Seriously, where is he and is he single?

  3. tim Says:

    hahahahahaha that guy is pretty witty

  4. kh Says:

    He’s in NYC and married–greatly enjoying his 15 minutes of anonymous fame…

  5. Alison Says:

    Both of these people are pathetic! Who says a woman’s beauty has to depreciate? What he really should have said was that her “inner beauty” was downright ugly and probably will always remain that way.

  6. gareth Says:

    Who says a womans beauty has to depreciate? uh - nature?

  7. Todd Says:

    Pump and Dump !! hahaha Classic, that Gold Digger gets whatever she deserves.

  8. Frank Steele Says:

    Plain Janes’ are loaded with class&wisdom………they know 10 times better than Ms.Gorgeous exactly what to do,they never relied on looks.

  9. Lisa Says:

    She has most likely been matched up with her life mate but was so stuck on money she let him pass on by. Shame women/people think money is more important than love,life,family and health. Perhaps she should meet up with Drew Peterson he makes good money and likes them young pretty girls.

  10. cynthiza Says:

    Wow! What have we women come to, to want to trade our looks for financial security, which is not truly security anyway? I feel compassion for this young woman who sees herself as a trading commodity instead of a feeling, living, being.

  11. narc Says:

    What? Why would you feel sorry for them? That’s absurd. I’m sorry, but in today’s day and age, its no longer considered “normal” for women to blame all their problems on societal structures, even their blatant greed and idiocy.

    I’d just like to point out about the financial security thing, that’s hardly new. Ever heard of alimony?

    But yes, there’s nothing quite as sweet as a retort based almost purely on science, well, social science. Bravo sir, bravo.

  12. HockeyLady Says:

    The girl is sad, the guy is brillant–and probably married.
    Fortunes can be made and lost, as can looks. As Saint Exupery said long ago in “Le Petit Prince”,”On ne voit q’avec le coeur. L’essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.” Trans: One can see only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eyes.

  13. Chris Says:

    pwnd!

  14. Ann Says:

    Perhaps she should have merely put down how much she earns and that she wanted someone that was competitive to that.

  15. DannyBly Says:

    Wow, what has the world come to? Hilarious, sad and a little bit true!

  16. Robin Says:

    I can be honest, too. It’s perfectly fine for a person to search for who they’re wanting. It’s a tough world out there. That being said however, what’s not fine is to want a person just for their money, their looks, their brains. There is actually a person involved there. So hopefully, when this young woman finds her ‘man’, she will consider his heart behind the other things she is looking for. If a wealthy person isn’t willing to spend time with me or grow with me, then I couldn’t do it. If I were wealthy, I would be fearful of people wanting me just for my money. I believe everyone is looking for that special someone who, despite everything, will love you no matter what.

  17. Jen Says:

    Your blog is hilarious. I found you on digg, and I will without a doubt become a reader of yours. My kind of humor. Love it! :)

Leave a Reply